It's interesting to see if anybody has ever sued a collection agency such as iQor, Inc formerly CBCL - Canadian Bonded Credit Limited - Now Iqor Collection Agency ..
It appears that iQor, Inc formerly CBCL - Canadian Bonded Credit Limited - Now Iqor Collection Agency was into some type of legal situation in this page:
CANADIAN BONDED CREDITS LIMITED
File No. PR-2005-011
TABLE OF CONTENTS
July 29, 2005
Mr. Ronald D. Lunau and
Ms. Catherine Beaudoin
Gowling Lafleur Henderson LLP
Suite 2600
160 Elgin Street
Ottawa, Ontario
K1P 1C3
Dear Mr. Lunau and Ms. Beaudoin:
Re:
Solicitation Number E60ZG-040001/B
Canadian Bonded Credits Limited (File No. PR-2005-011)
The Canadian International Trade Tribunal (the Tribunal) (Pierre Gosselin, Presiding Member) has reviewed the complaint submitted on behalf of Canadian Bonded Credits Limited ( iQor, Inc formerly CBCL - Canadian Bonded Credit Limited - Now Iqor Collection Agency ) on July 20, 2005, and has decided not to initiate an inquiry into this complaint.
iQor, Inc formerly CBCL - Canadian Bonded Credit Limited - Now Iqor Collection Agency alleged that the Department of Public Works and Government Services (PWGSC) wrongly disqualified iQor, Inc formerly CBCL - Canadian Bonded Credit Limited - Now Iqor Collection Agency 's response to the solicitation and requested that the proposal be re-instated as a compliant bid.
Subsection 7(1)(c) of the Canadian International Trade Tribunal Procurement Inquiry Regulations reads, in part, that the Tribunal shall, within five working days after the day on which the complaint is filed, determine whether "the information provided by the complainant ... discloses a reasonable indication that the procurement has not been carried out in accordance with whichever one of Chapter Ten of NAFTA, Chapter Five of the Agreement on Internal Trade or the Agreement on Government Procurement ...applies".
According to the complaint, on February 22, 2005, iQor, Inc formerly CBCL - Canadian Bonded Credit Limited - Now Iqor Collection Agency requested clarification concerning mandatory paragraph D.2.1.3, and more specifically whether or not it could use federal government experience as one of the three references required by that paragraph.
