by Raymond » Tue Oct 07, 2008 12:49:23 PM
Kind of interesting how these stiffs get all out of whack when someone, because of an accident or job loss, goes belly up on a credit card for a few grand. But when an endless list of CEO's whose companies are tanking, make off with hundreds of millions of dollars in severance packages (like the ones at Merrill Lynch and Washington Mutual week). In many cases, they're the ones who precipitated the need for a bailout in the first place, but not an eyebrow gets raised.
You'd think that shareholders would complain about the Canadian bank CEO's who get a $10 million dollar Christmas bonus, whether or not they made their companies made any money; but no. One would also think the average bank teller making 14 or 15 bucks an hour, and multi-tasking the work previously done by 2 employees so the CEO can get a megabonus every year would also complain. But no, they also don't because, typically, they are well insulated from what happens at the top. What they do see is some construction worker with 4 kids who defaults on his Mastercard because he had an accident and can't survive on Workman's Comp.
The bank or bank's collector doesn't want to understand that their credit card interest rate of 19% to consumers and 4% to the merchants more than offsets the annual 2.5% default rate. The construction worker couldn't help getting in the accident. Nor did he likely want to default on his credit card, yet he had no choice. He didn't set out to screw the bank, but can the same be said for the bank ceo's who bailed out with $20,000,000 severance packages last week?
Ray