In Ontario, as well as in most other provinces, there's a mandatory pretrial settlement conference before it goes to actual trial. Even if the sharks sued her, she'd be better off since they would have to take time off attend a mediation. If the company didn't accept a reduced mediated settlement, the judge, when it came to trial, would likely offer her fairly easy terms - far easier than what she's got now if she explained her ornerous circumstances. Besides, it take months to get to pretrial, then trial and then to file sheriff's fees ($100+) for wage attachments. That's why they are unlikely to sue for 1200 bucks
However, sometimes these companies will file statements of claim, knowing that a large portion of their client base will be of a demographic that won't show up for court and they can expediently get a default judgment. Nonetheless, for modest amounts, it's not worth the frequent filer court fees, paralegal costs and writ filing charges, plus hassle, time and paperwork etc.
And so, more often than not, these defaulted debts are sold off as portfolios. You can see fom the link posted on the Credit Bureau Collections website, a group of 8 typical debt debt portfolios are offered in a classified ARM (Account Receivable Management) section for collection industry debt buyers. The 3'rd one down involves a payday loan portfolio being auctioned off for circa @2.9% of original receivables. Though the portfolios are American, they are similar to Canadian ones in that the average defaulted account is just under $700. Really, not much point in taking these people to court for any debt holder.
http://www.insidearm.com/go/portfolios
What all this means is that the payday loan company knows they 3 options in cases like Saralee's
1. Take her to court and suffer through all the time and expenses, not all of which will be reimbursed) and risk never collecting on the judgment, especially if she leaves her present job.
2. Get a couple of pennies on the dollar way down the road from a debt buyer.
3. Accept Saralee's offer of 150 or 200 bucks a month (or preferably less).
Which do you think they will take?
That's why I said I felt she was being too generous with the scavengers.
As for interest, I would forget about it in any negotiation outside of court. Those sharks have made enough already. Even though they will howl and whine they need 30% (or whatever), given the options of 1,2 or 3, I'm sure they would be secretly relieved if they were relatively certain they could recover the current balance over the next year or so in monthly payments.
Ray