• U.S. Economy Turns Socialistic?

    I am pretty furious about the U.S. economy's bailout of AIG, and the $700 billion bailout of the bad debt in the U.S.

    In my opinion, that makes the U.S. government owner of business, which makes them pretty socialistic.

    CNN's Mad as hell - taxpayers lash out

    The U.S. free economy is supposed to be based on free enterprise without intervention from the government. Of all the businesses that have failed over the years, and the pain people have suffered because of businesses failures, the government never stepped in to help. Which is the nature of business.

    Of the 1,000,000+ individuals that declared bankruptcy in the U.S. in the last year or so, the government didn't bail out those families. That's alot of pain and suffering that these bankrupt people suffered.

    So.. why now? Why is the government stepping in and bailing out AIG, and then the whole bad debt economy?

    Simply put, IMO, if the government doesn't step in, their whole economy will implode. Falling share prices will mean less value on balance sheets for companies to borrow against. This will mean that their loans will be called for lack of collateral and so on...

    And, the point is... ???

    It's a free enterprise system. It's supposed to collapse if errors are made. While I admit that the whole U.S. economy collapsing would be extremely bad, that's the way it was built, and that's the way it should be run.

    I fear that the ramifications of having the government step in will be even worse. If AIG declared bankruptcy, it would have to do what every other business does when it fails. It would have to liquidate assets at a discount and then start over again. While 1 trillion dollars in assets is alot to liquidate, that's the way it should be.

    I feel pretty sore as well with the U.S. government bailing out businesses.

    I also believe that this move will help other countries lose ALOT of respect for the U.S. economy over the next few years. This may be even more expensive to the U.S. businesses and citizens over the years to come.

    GOVERNMENTS... Stay out of businesses' business!!

    Memo:
    From the desk of Monty Loree

    P.S.. I've held my tongue on this... This topic makes me furious.

    Questions that this article talks about:
    Is the U.S. economy becoming more socialistic?
    Who is helping the consumers who declare bankruptcy?
    What happens if the government doesn't step in?


Add Your Comments:
Fields with * are required
Your Comment Below:
 
Name*
 
Email*
 
Website
 
Code*
 
Enter Above Code
 
Note: Comments are moderated - Spam will be deleted
 

3 Comments
On Sep 25, 2008, David Gowing Said:
The non-linear derivative market is deliberately mis-priced from the academic world down, allowing near -arbitrage profits to those big enough to write (short position) puts and calls. Empirical evidence is overwhelming here: in the last 25 years plus of options sales, My paper \'Sharing risk is equivalent to trading risk under risk neutral pricing and no-arbitrage assumptions\' is published in the Chicago Quantitative Alliance proceedings of April 14, 2004 in Los Vegas Nevada. The academic world is trying to suppress this paper. The academic world suppressed Louis Bachelier\'s paper using Geometric Brownian Motion to price linear stock market assets in 1898, for 70 years! Einstein\'s paper in 1905 on relativity borrowed half it\'s math from Bachlier\'s paper unreferenced. Later Einstein was quoted as saying \'genius is the ability to hide ones references\'.
The Chicago Board of Exchange stopped giving financial data on options to academics in 1996, and sent a threatening letter to all academics who had already received data, stating if the academic shared this data with any other academic(s) the CBOE would sue them.
The only surprise is it took > 10 years for the house of lies to start crumbling.
Problem is they began believing their own lies and when mis-pricing CDS they must have forgotten the fact they where not hedging systematic risk (macro events like war and printing too much money = inflation). This was most certainly deliberate from the top, i.e. the world bank and the Federal Reserve (and the 12 fed. reserve banks) which are > 90% foreign owned. Not American owned! No monetary policy, no sovereignty period.
After the Sept 11, 2001 sale of CAT bonds did not take off, as they where mis-priced (over priced). The re-insurance market swallowed up this new trillion dollar market, as insurance methodology is sharing risk and sharing risk is the only accurate way of measuring systematic risk. Why do you think Warren Buffett centers his empire on an insurance company?

Reply to this comment By David Gowing P.Eng. on 2008-09-25 16:54:03
On Sep 23, 2008, Monty Loree Said:
Thanks for the comments Jay,
I don't think we'll send you any money, but your comments are well taken.

I think it's completely unjust that the U.S. is going to use tax payers money to bail out big corporations..

That doesn't set a good example for anybody.
If the companies are going to fail, let them fail.
On Sep 23, 2008, Jay Said:
What the US government has done is no different from what Nigeria & Zimbabwe have routinely done in the past which is raiding public coffers to fund the interests of those who are cronies of the executive branch of the government.

Remember...Cheney ran Haliburton into the ground, and then when he became VP, Haliburton miraculously got $20 billion in untendered contracts in Iraq, and is now solvent. Rumsfeld ran GD Searle, and then used his influence in the Reagan administration to push though approvals for Aspartame long before proper testing was complete. (Aspartame NOW is shown to cause brain troubles). Henry Paulson (treasury secretary) made $500 million when he ran Goldman Sachs, which is one of the indirect beneficiaries of the trillion dollar bailout.

Hmmm...what the hell...I'll try it too.

My name Odingwa Ube and I am the former undersecretary of the Ministry of Petroleum of Nigeria. When the current government took power they unjustly tried to confiscate our reserve fund, which has been safely hidden in a Nigerian bank. I need to transfer it overseas to an account held by somebody unknown to the government. I would be willing to pay you 5% of the $US 24,789,247 for your troubles. Please send me your bank account numbers, credit card numbers ....

Good luck.

Jay