Okay,
So there are a few factual errors that are usually assumptions made by internet research that is sometimes faulty.
The main one I want to deal with is "If the original creditor is in your credit file, the collection agency has no right to put themselves in there." this is only partially true.
If the origional creditor already has a bad debt listed to your bureau, but then lists it with a collection agency - then the origional listing should be removed as the new listing is more factual. The majority of creditors protect themselves by adding clauses in their contracts that say they can provide your information to a collection agency and subsequiently the credit bureau.
For the guy with the awesome credit and the small debt - I would wait. Don't give them anything in writting. The "date of last activity is not only in reference to the date of last payment - but the last acknowledgement of debt" this can be a written agreement to a settlement or offering a payment plan, also if their calls are recorded they could technically use that as it is verifiable. In Alberta - they have 2 years from the date of last activity to sue you, but the statute of limitations on how long they can contact you for payment is 7 years.
Realistically - no one will sue you for $200.00 - but they are unable to have marks removed from your bureau because they need to justify that it was listed to collections in error - and that can only be done if it is not a true and valid debt. It sucks, no way aroud that.
Also, your score might be skewed by the bad debt on your file, but creditors look to so much more - and the detbs that are in good standing will count in your favor. I will say that if you actually want to go for a significant loan or mortgage - then pay it.



