by DanielBl » Wed Aug 24, 2011 03:10:07 PM
Oh, my goodness, my goodness! I wouldn't know where to begin. I really wouldn't. Some people might call that a deal, including the government, to save face; but "sellout" is the only proper name I can come up with.
I was already quite aware of those "mutual concessions," but they're completely out of the ambit of what I'd call a settlement.
Denise Peletier, the 407ETR ombudsman, is a recycled bill collector who personally termed anyone who refuses to go along with their tolls "a deadbeat."
10% to 15% savings over the next 4 years? Savings off what? Off the outrageous increases they were going to foist on us anyway? Not to mention the "savings" that were to be offset by the throng of hidden appeal and criminal administration surcharges they secretly intended to (and did) tack on.
I know the Liberal government, in order to save face, said it was good deal for motorists; and the 407ETR was only too happy (with a big sigh of relief) to correspondingly chime in that it was a good deal for their foreign owned corporation as well.
No, by a real settlement, I meant that the government must reverse the Mike Harris - Ernie Eves "Common Sense Revolution" decision to sell off the highway - a decision which was inherently flawed and should never have been made in the first place. A decision which was going to shaft Canadians for the next 99 years! The only solution was to expropriate the property, and return the Spanish consortium's 3.1 billion dollars (along with something for their time and trouble), and send them packing back to Spain and Australia.
Let them shaft their own countrymen, if they wanted - but leave Canadians alone! Ontario taxpayers have paid for the 1.6 billion construction costs many, many, many, many times over through their outrageous fuel taxes. And now, they're going to have to suffer having a foreign conglomerate gouge them for the next 99 years! Unfortunately, much of the fuel tax went into government gold plated pensions, not the highway renewal projects they were intended for. Only 2 to 5% was actually allocated to roadbuilding and maintenace. And that's a good deal? For who?
Earlier on [in this forum], on a 407ETR thread, there's a pretty good analysis by another blogger showing the Canarsi Indians, who sold Manhattan Island to the Dutch for $24 in 1623, even when considering the current astronomical land prices, actually got a better deal than Ontario Motorists. Common Sense Revolution? Or Senseless Revolution?
Most of the remaining points of the "settlement" below are such an insult to intelligence, they're too onerous to even comment on, a case in point being "the Hardship Program."
Getting plate denial rescinded in bankruptcy is hardly what I'd call a victory. You might not have a car left after that anyway.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ontario government & 407ETR announce settlement
Posted on Fri, 2006-03-31 21:06
If this had come out twelve hours later it would have been taken for an April 1 spoof. The province of Ontario and 407ETR say this afternoon (Mar 31) they have settled their differences. Really! The province will wind up its multiple law suits against the Toronto tollroad concessionaire, while the tollroad will:
* institute frequent-user toll discounts of 10 to 15% over four years
* spend $34m (C$40m) on a benefits program for 100k customers
* appoint an ombudsman to adjudicate customer disputes
* hold off collection agent actions and credit reporting pending dispute resolution
* improve information to customers on their appeal options
* give truckers multi-tiered discounts for night-time and off-peak use, and reduce or eliminate video toll charges
* increase highway capacity by a third and ten years ahead of schedule
* provide a repayment plan to lift license plate denial for hardship violator cases