Debt Settlement - Global Credit and Collections Featuring Deanna Natale aka Lawyer after me for 12 year old Credit Card Debt - Canada

a good place to talk about links

RE: Oh no! Bad News for Collection Agencies!

Postby vampchick21 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 08:05:44 AM

For the record, I was referring to sending Pitkin the actual draft court documents referenced, not worms or anything else.

If I'd had a slight bit more time when I was typing out that post (or a slight bit more coffee.....), I'd have made that clearer.
vampchick21
Member
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 06:02:52 PM
Province: ON


RE: Oh no! Bad News for Collection Agencies!

Postby Raymond » Tue Dec 09, 2008 07:42:41 AM

A lot of people (probably including guys like Brian Pitkin, himself) view this website. I know that certain members of the Law Society of Upper Canada Discipline Department do.

There's a boundary that remarks must obey even when expressing valid reactions of annoyance and disgust. And so, it's not helpful and completely destroys the forum's credibility when people suggest doing illegal things like sending noxious and illegal substances in the mail. Some of these comments should be at least reedited because they do more harm than good. No one is going to take the Forum seriously with posts like that.

Ray
Raymond
Member
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44:29 AM
Province: ON


RE: Oh no! Bad News for Collection Agencies!

Postby vampchick21 » Tue Dec 09, 2008 07:06:10 AM

I'd actually send them directly to Pitkin.
vampchick21
Member
Posts: 178
Joined: Wed May 28, 2008 06:02:52 PM
Province: ON


RE: Oh no! Bad News for Collection Agencies!

Postby Ottawa_Chap » Tue Dec 09, 2008 12:48:51 AM

So if one has received one of these bogus documents, is it best to stay silent, or, say, respond by sending the ontario lawyers their original letter?

Ok..I've received one of those documents I'll choose to remain silent - and ignore their letter. I/E no worms will be sent on my behalf. I don't aim to provoke trouble, but I'm also not oppose to anyone choosing to vent their frustrations to companies of the sort, either.

O.C.
Infuriating one C/A at a time..
Ottawa_Chap
Member
Posts: 473
Joined: Thu Jun 26, 2008 09:03:04 PM
Province: ON


Oh no! Bad News for Collection Agencies!

Postby Raymond » Tue Dec 09, 2008 10:18:03 AM

Oh no! What's the D-Rex of Debt, Deanna Natale gonna do now?

It appears our complaining about those phoney "Form 7A's" (draft/pseudo Statements of Claim) which collection agencies pay lawyers $15 a pop to send out may have had a hand in motivating Brian Pitkin, Registrar of Ontario Collection Agencies, to no longer tolerate them..

Mark Silverthorn's website contains info on his interviews about the above issue by the Toronto Star Newspaper and CFRB 1010 radio.

http://www.collection-calls.ca/breaking-news-for-ontario-residents.html

The article also informs readers that collection agencies' manipulation through needlessly racking up debtors' cell phone charges will no longer be tolerated.

This forum has been hammering Pitkin's lack of action since Deanna Natale started flooding the country with bogus Court documents and legal threats. She did so immediatley after dumping piranha outfit, Total Credit Recovery and going with nearby Global Credit and Collections in early 2007 to spread her misery.

As Mark states, he, along with countless other collection lawyers, mailed out thousands of psuedo court documents which they knew were in clear violation of the Collections Act of Ontario, Reg. 74. But since Brian Pitkin refused to do anything, collection lawyers had little to fear.

** It should be noted that Reg. 74 (1990) of the Collection Agencies Act of Ontario has been updated by Regulation 103/06 and contains the prohibition about serving misleading court documents in Section 23(1)

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/source/regs/english/2006/elaws_src_regs_r06103_e.htm

(Please don't get Reg. 74 confused with RSO 1990, Chapter 14 of the Ontario Collection Agencies Act.)

http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90c14_e.htm#BK25)

Silverthorn, on his website, fails to mention, what I've been saying all along about such practices being a direct violation of the Rules of Professional Conduct 2.02(6) of the Law Society of Upper Canada. Being a lawyer himself, who's sent out thousands of these rubbish documents, and likely not wishing to offend his peers who still do, (like David Pomer of Pomer & Boccia), he conscipuously avoids this important fact in his media interviews.

Perhaps our endless criticism of Pitkin's lethargy (or divided allegiance) may have motivated him to announce his Ministry will take enforcement action. Personally, I'll believe it when I see it. but at least he's put collection lawyers on public notice.

Ray
Raymond
Member
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44:29 AM
Province: ON


Rate "The Silver Bullet"

Postby Raymond » Mon Nov 24, 2008 07:00:08 PM

Has anyone had a chance to use Mark Silverthorn's services yet? If so what did you think? Surprisingly, for all the exposure and promo this forum has given him and his book, I thought at least a few people by now would have consulted him. Nevertheless, an outfit like his requires big money to keep it going. But if you're in debt, you're hard pressed to begin with.

Monty, in fact, mentioned that he wanted to talk to me. I'm not sure about what. Probably to thank and tell me what a wonderful guy I am.

Ray
Raymond
Member
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44:29 AM
Province: ON


Canada's Top 10

Postby Raymond » Wed Nov 12, 2008 11:45:42 AM

With the increase in frenzied collection calls expected this Christmas season as collectors and debt buyers vie for who's going to get the biggest Christmas bonus by chasing down the most accident victims, it seems appropriate that this forum should run it's own contest to determine who the top collector in Canada is.

Admittedly, the idea was reinspired by Mark Silverthorn's gathering of the 1500 "most influential" people in the Canadian consumer collections industry; but before he sues us, we should qualify that this contest is different - we are only interested in those directly involved in collections themselves - that is to say debt buyers, collection lawyers, and of course, collection agents. Everyone knows they have friends in government regulation, consumer protection and commercial lending; nonetheless, we are confining ourselves to collections per se. Besides having only one category, it's far more practical to restrict the list to the top 10. Who the hell can remember 1500 names? Besides, what honour is there in being 1237th out of 1500? Forget that!

Also, our criteria are different. Unlike Silverthorn, we are not looking for the "most inflential," but instead, like Bud Hibbs, the "best of the worst," er I mean, the "worst of the worst" or the "worst of the best" or.......Oh hang it, you know what I'm trying to say - the biggest baddest bottom feeders out there.

It'll be a tough contest because there are so many deserving candidates. I certainly know who would be on my list. However, so as not to influence anyone's vote, I won't mention "you know who" and let you decide for yourself.

First prize is the 24 karat specimen below. But that's not all. The winning collector/lawyer/debt buyer will also to receive 10 tons of manure to go along with it to augment their job performance output.



Ray

PS: Before Silverthorn gets on the phone with "I'm gonna sue your *** off," we should mention that we also ran something similar called the "Condie" Awards during early 2007, for the top collector in Canada. So in fairness, perhaps he got the idea from our forum and we could could countersue.


The "Condie" Award
Raymond
Member
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44:29 AM
Province: ON


Please Help: I'm So confused!

Postby Raymond » Mon Nov 10, 2008 08:08:06 PM

Can someone please help me? I hate to ask these 2 questions again but I'm having no luck finding answers.

Mark Silverthorn and his new book are currently featured in the "Canadian Lawyer" magazine. Sniffing the winds of change which have blown in the consumer debt crisis, he has "crossed the street" so to speak.

http://www.collection-calls.com/share-story.html

A man's gotta do what a man's gotta do. Fair enough. But I'm still mystified about 2 things on his website which were not addressed during his podcast last month.

1. He's still soliciting personal stories from consumers, their advocates, past/ current collection agency employees, creditors, government regulators etc. about their experiences with collection agencies.

But they just can't be any stories; they can only be "nice" stories. I realize that's not the term he uses on his website, but it's difficult to see how they could be of any other type. They're only eligible for inclusion if they don't offend anyone as they have to follow 15 complicated clauses and sub clauses full of esoteric legalese. Above all, they must not be

"unlawful, harmful, threatening, abusive, harassing, tortuous, defamatory, vulgar, libellous, hateful or racially or ethnically or otherwise objectionable...."

He wouldn't want to get sued - but if he does, you agree to be on the liability hook.

In Common Law [jurisprudence] there are various criteria necessary for something in the media to be considered "fair comment" as opposed to being libellous or "tortuous" (actionable). The first thing they teach you in civil law is how utterly capricious judges can be. Therefore, the only way to be absolutely safe is to always say nice things; things which even the most irascible could not misconstrue.

So my question is: how many experiences are there with a collection agency are there which don't fall into one (or usually most) of the above categories? Out of 8000 posts on this forum, we don't have any except for a couple of incognito collection agent lamely posing as happy debtors in collections.

2) The second question regards his gathering of nominations for the 1500 most influential people involved in the Canadian consumer collection industry. They are to come from the following categories:

1) Collection agencies

- owners

- senior managers

- collection supervisors

2) Collection agency service providers

- industry consultants

- vendors providing goods and services to collection agencies

3) Credit grantors

- senior management responsible for liaison with collection agencies

4) Credit reporting agencies

- senior management

5) Government regulators

- senior civil servants responsible for regulating collection agencies

6) Lawyers
- lawyers doing high-volume consumer debt collection work

It's highly unlikely the average consumer or those who comprise his target market would have any knowledge of any of these groups - except perhaps for a scant knowledge of groups (1) and (6).

Moreover, it's especially noteworthy that Silverthorn groups these people as all being integral to (or cogwheels) in the collections industry. This is indeed the case, though one might not initially perceive that Consumer Protection and Credit Bureaus, have as their principal reason for being, ensuring everyone pays their bills on time.

Nonetheless, restricting ourselves to the first and last categories, just what does Silverthorn mean by "most influential?" What goes around comes around. Psychological reciprocity. The greatest fear of any lawyer who has spent his life threatening to sue people is that of getting sued himself. Thus I'm confused what Silverthorn means by the term "influential."

If it's being used euphemistically, is he referring to those who did what they had to do to get the biggest yachts and Christmas bonuses. If so, and he didn't want to risk offending his industry peers, present and past, why not simply solicit a list of their yacht sizes? Only Silverthorn knows for sure - and he's not saying.

Ray
Raymond
Member
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44:29 AM
Province: ON


WARNING: GRAPHIC & DISTURBING CONTENT FOLLOWS

Postby Raymond » Mon Oct 27, 2008 06:33:58 PM

Warning: this article contains material of a graphic, objectionable and disturbing nature unsuitable for minors and immature audiences. Viewer (in)discretion advised. Do not read if solid food has been consumed within 4 hours.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In the finest tradition of "Voelkischer Beobachter," and in the euphemistic jargon of collection agencynomics, the following excerpts are taken from Global Credit and Collections' website. Image manipulation is a prime tool of all financial nazis in the business world and Global is no exception.

This is also the company that Natale Law Offices "works" with/out of. They are in suite 400 and Natale is in suite 405. Those of you who have been unable to contact Natale and/or Global via phone will see why you will also have a hard time dropping by to discuss your account or arrange a payment.

What goes around comes around. The telephone terrorists appear to have found it necessary to adopt a bunker style venue to make them feel safe. They and their collection lawyers haven't made too many friends because of the fear they've bombarded so many accident and job loss victims with. Yet, this accusation would be met with vehement denials. How can this be since they claim to be solid corporate participants in community welfare programs?

If Global Collections is so highly regarded by the community and they've won the numerous business awards posted on their website, then why is a Hell's Angel's bunker style headquarters necessary? The only other places you see that are in cities like Baghdad.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

http://www.globalcollection.net/index.cfm

Global Credit & Collection Inc. is a Canadian corporation that provides accounts receivable management solutions to the business community throughout Canada . The company is engaged in collection services for some of the major financial and business institutions in the country. As well as numerous national and local businesses requiring collection and outsource solutions. Today the company is the 7 th largest collection company in the country......

...GLOBAL International maintains a state of the art collection facility in Markham, Ontario. Markham is a suburb of Toronto and is approximately 20 miles from the downtown core. The centre is located in Markham, Ontario in a Class A high-rise office building and GLOBAL occupies 28,000 square feet of space. Security is paramount to GLOBAL Credit and this facility, occupied by professional companies, maintains a controlled card entry system as well as biometric fingerprint access at all entry doors. After normal working hours, entry to the building is restricted and visitors gain entry only through appointment.....

.....All visitors who enter the Global facility are required to sign in and out of the office and wear visitor badges. All visitors are ESCORTED at all times by employees of the company. Security cameras are used in all sensitive areas including door entry, accounting and telephone and computer server rooms. Additionally, all sensitive areas have controlled access to authorized employees only and all offices have cipher locks on all access doors.....

...GLOBAL HAS A COMMITMENT TO TREAT CUSTOMERS AND DEBTORS WITH THE UTMOST DIGNITY AND RESPECT, while negotiating solutions that meet the needs of our clients and their customers, thereby never compromising the reputation of our clients.

A commitment to our staff to make their careers at GLOBAL A FUN AND REWARDING EXPERIENCE, thereby developing unquestionable loyalty and dedication, resulting in the HIGHEST DEGREE OF JOB SATISAFACTION POSSIBLE....

While the company is engaged in the collection of accounts, THE EMPLOYEES AND MANAGEMENT ARE INVOLVED IN THE COMMUNITY AND ARE CONCERNED WITH THE WELFARE OF OTHERS. MUCH OF THE COMPANY'S SUCCESS IS RELATED TO WORKING WITH PEOPLE. [Smelling salts, please!]


A business approach with concern for a consumer requiring assistance with its financial problems is the approach taken by the management and staff. We look for solutions to assist people rather than making a more difficult circumstance for them. [Forget the smelling salts, pass me the cyanide!!]



Ray

Raymond
Member
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44:29 AM
Province: ON


Are Canada's Best Better than America's Worst?

Postby Raymond » Tue Oct 21, 2008 01:44:24 PM

I was anxiously awaiting Mark Silverthorn's list of the 1500 most influential people in the Canadian consumer collections industry.

I know (my favorite) Bud Hibbs has composed both a list of "America's [Elite] Worst" collection agencies and a list of the worst overall 300 (actually 273) in the US out of a total of 6500. 273 seems like a lot, but if you've made his list, you're in the top 4% of the rogues gallery.

http://www.budhibbs.com/am_worst_collection.htm
http://www.budhibbs.com/coll_to_avoid_list.htm

It's quite clear what Bud Hibbs means by "top" because he explicitly tells us: "bottom feeders," "dumbest," "scavengers," "crooks," "drunken sailors," "bums," collection agencies," "con artists" etc. I could go on but you get the idea.

In contrast, I'm not sure what Silverthorn meant by "most influential" when he solicited readers to submit their online picks for the Canadian collections industry.

If anyone speaks to him, could you find out what he means by "most influential"? Lawyers grow up in a culture where everything is carefully worded. They do so because, in the jungle of civil law, suing is the first tool of the trade. Every lawyer fears getting sued by every other lawyer; consequently, everything they say is heavily nuanced. Some civil lawyers are trained to sue at the drop of a hat. Hence, the many frivolous lawsuits society has to endure both in Canada and the US.

Thus it's hard to figure out what Silverthorn means by the term "most influential" Does he mean "most successful," "most nasty," largest staffed," "most branches," "most recoveries" etc? I don't want to be so presumptuous as to put words in his mouth, because if I create the slightest offense, I might get sued.

Was he reluctant to use plain language like Bud Hibbs for fear of offending the many colleagues with whom he worked? Or does he use the term in a euphemistic sense to refer to the richest, biggest, most powerful people in the industry, but avoid bringing up what those people had to do to get there? Please let me know.

On a personal note, the one data set I was most interested in learning of, he omitted. I would have enjoyed seeing which collection agency owner, collection lawyer, or debt buyer ceo has the biggest yacht.

I think the most informative parameter about influential people in the collection industry is their yacht size. Or, if they have more than one, as I'm sure many do, what is the size of their biggest yacht? Surely, that parameter is the one most highly correlated to their level of industry influence.

Ray

Raymond
Member
Posts: 1421
Joined: Tue Jan 23, 2007 12:44:29 AM
Province: ON


Return to Debt Settlement - Discussion Area