by chansen » Thu Nov 12, 2009 08:24:37 PM
You wanted to close the thread, and I intended to respect that, but now you've asked a question, so I`ll do my best to answer, without name-calling.
Basically, there is no new information about the MMA. It has been debunked long ago. Its sales are in the toilet, and only a few agents even try any more. Those of us who have taken great offense to our friends or relatives being scammed, have done a pretty good job of taking the debate online. No agent has been able to prove the MMA is efficient in theory, or in practice. Any prospective client who Googles the MMA, will find our information, and become a lost sale.
The obfuscation you see from mortgagewriter is par for the course. An agent thinks he or she can salvage the reputation of the MMA with anecdotes and condescension, and just keeps posting, telling us how "amusing" the "naysayers" are. I can link you to literally thousands of similar exchanges. None of them address the broken math of the MMA software, and none substantiate the claims of savings.
United First Financial does not want this, and have repeatedly told agents to stop the online debate. The more these exchanges go on, the higher these exchanges are ranked in Google. Agents, including mortgagewriter, have unwittingly contributed to the demise of the MMA.
I don't know why I got involved. I shouldn't have bothered. But by now, I'm looking forward to seeing the company fade away.
*****
What I didn't appreciate earlier, is being accused of having a sockpuppet account. Every forum software I'm aware of logs the IP from each post. montyloree, if you would be so kind, would you mind confirming that cream and I are not the same person? Thanks.